Well, so I think we know where you end up if you listen to the other people on the forum. So, Sharky makes a perfectly reasonable and valid suggestion one the forum, to make a generic version of IndyCar. We had originally considered this, such good an idea it is. It was always in the plan to have a generic version for private games at least, and as time goes on, to see how things work out, and maybe go foward with a sole public, generic version, with Long Beach certainly, and Toronto a possiblity, at the possible expense of Surfers and Nashville. You see, 2009 is less suited to historically accurate than 2008, no transition teams, and it won't be seen as such a historic season.
But anyhow, this was actually a very good suggestion. Indeed, I have since PMed Jules about it, and if he likes, then we're go. And, as I said, we will see how things go, and make our minds up as we go along, what is the right direction with such things as the multiple compound tyres and the transitional teams, will they still be obviously weeker on the ovals?
But still, there were still some people who just didn't read what was written, but still have the divine right to comment. Firstly, Shane Van Rooy came along and said no, then started a suggestion for CCWS 2007, a truly dreadful suggestion. All because he couldn't be bothered to read it. Jef had a similar response, said that he didn't bother reading it, and when I asked him how he could comment something that he knows nothing about, he just replied that he knew it all along, which really doesn't make any sense (I expect nothing better from Jef). James Donald, didn't read it, expressed an opinion which presumably relates to public games. So, that's three guys who think that they can comment on something they know nothing about. Who choose to ignore it. Great.
Fortuantly, the suggestion does have support, thanks to the people who really matter (subject to Jules being added to that) doing something about it. And I can't see CC 2007 coming, thank you very much.
But just remember, some people think more of themselves than they really should. And they're more than willing to share that with you. despite the fact that they cannot support their opions, or even show any signs of knowing a thing about what they're talking about. Oh Joy.
But anyhow, this was actually a very good suggestion. Indeed, I have since PMed Jules about it, and if he likes, then we're go. And, as I said, we will see how things go, and make our minds up as we go along, what is the right direction with such things as the multiple compound tyres and the transitional teams, will they still be obviously weeker on the ovals?
But still, there were still some people who just didn't read what was written, but still have the divine right to comment. Firstly, Shane Van Rooy came along and said no, then started a suggestion for CCWS 2007, a truly dreadful suggestion. All because he couldn't be bothered to read it. Jef had a similar response, said that he didn't bother reading it, and when I asked him how he could comment something that he knows nothing about, he just replied that he knew it all along, which really doesn't make any sense (I expect nothing better from Jef). James Donald, didn't read it, expressed an opinion which presumably relates to public games. So, that's three guys who think that they can comment on something they know nothing about. Who choose to ignore it. Great.
Fortuantly, the suggestion does have support, thanks to the people who really matter (subject to Jules being added to that) doing something about it. And I can't see CC 2007 coming, thank you very much.
But just remember, some people think more of themselves than they really should. And they're more than willing to share that with you. despite the fact that they cannot support their opions, or even show any signs of knowing a thing about what they're talking about. Oh Joy.
No comments:
Post a Comment